Is it Harder to Prove a Hypothesis than to Disprove It Essay

Published: 2020-02-23 12:32:22
472 words
2 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Harder

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Is it Harder to Prove a Hypothesis than to Disprove It A hypothesis is a statement that gives explanation or generalization about certain facts or principle, from which a basis for possible set of experiments to confirm it can be formed. It can never be proven true but in some ways it can be verified by certain scientific or theoretical approach (The American Heritage Science, 2005). Therefore, a hypothesis can either be accepted or rejected depending on the results or data gathered through the experiment. Given this, which is more difficult to do, prove a hypothesis or the other way around?

In order to know this, lets us use an accepted hypothesis that the cheetahs are the fastest land animals on earth. To prove this, we should conduct an experiment, say, by measuring the speed of the entire land animal on earth. Having the results, compare all their speed. To further confirm it, the experiment should be repeated many times. In addition to that, the result should agree with that of the others that conduct the same experiment. In doing so, one is establishing repeatability and credibility of facts gathered.

Then after all that experiments, you are able to prove your hypothesis. How about disproving it? In my opinion, doing this is much difficult to do. The difficulty lies in the fact that this hypothesis, which is, cheetahs are the fastest land animal on earth is well established already. Disproving a hypothesis is like formulating a new one but the additional difficulty is when the hypothesis being disproved, as mentioned, is a well-established one. One should also do an experiment in order to gather supporting data for the claim. Another problem arises here.

The time for a definite result to come out may take too long. In addition do that, the claim should be consistent with other well-accepted hypothesis. In our cases, in disproving that cheetah is the fastest land animal, one should find laws or other hypothesis that may support this claim. Comparing the two cases, in proving a hypothesis, if it is a new one, the main consideration here is the validity of the facts gathered. Unlike in disproving a hypothesis, it also considers the hypothesis being disproved and also the validity of the facts gathered in disproving it.

In other words, in disproving a hypothesis, you are considering two hypotheses, your own and the other one being disprove. In telling whether a hypothesis is harder to prove or disprove depends on the hypothesis itself. One should considered all the studies and laws that are related to the hypothesis. In this case of disproving a well-established hypothesis, disproving it is much harder. But as mentioned, it all depends on the hypothesis itself.

Reference The American Heritage Science. (2005). Hypothesis. Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved December 9, 2007 from .

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read