After leaving his mothers cave, he is introduced to a vast, confusing world. As a defense against the rest of the universe, Grendel establishes existentialism as his philosophy. Grendel is initially confused about the things around him, but soon encounters humans, creatures who seem to share a common language and thought. He tries to decipher meaning out of the humans by watching them. Grendel witnesses the early evolution of Hrothgars kingdom, watching them season after season ¦ from the high cliff wall (37) conquering each other and other kingdoms, quickly expanding into a powerful empire.
In Chapter 5, Grendel falls in the lair of the Dragon. Through his conversation with the Dragon, Grendel is introduced to nihilism. The Dragon it seems, is the ultimate nihilistic entity who knows the beginning, the present, the end . all time, all space. (62, 63) The Dragon believes that all things in the universe will come to an end and are therefore meaningless and discounts existentialism as a philosophy. His final advice to Grendel is to seek out gold and sit on it (74) if for no sake other then doing it.
Grendel leaves the Dragons lair with a renewed confidence in himself. Believing the Dragons words to be true, Grendel finds no reason to restrain his inherently destructive desires. Grendel proceeds as a terrible monster, fulfilling all of his evil fantasies. Grendels new found nihilism however, is quickly invalidated by the hero Beowulf, who comes to Hrothgars kingdom after hearing of their trouble with Grendel. The coming of Beowulf is the ultimate abomination of nihilism. While Grendel represents meaningless death and destruction, Beowulf represents regeneration and goodness.
While the Dragon instilled in Grendel that all things are meaningless, Beowulf teaches Grendel that where the water was rigid there will be fish and the world will burn green, sperm build again. (170) Thus, Gardner discounts both nihilism and existentialism to be detrimental. Gardner then goes on to describe the evolutionary path of both Grendel and Hrothgars Thanes. From the vantage point of his cliff, Grendel watches the pattern of destruction inflicted by Hrothgar and his men upon other kingdoms as they expand their power and influence.
Grendel witnesses on a soft summer night, as many as three [mead] halls burning at once. (37) Instead of making war on them, [Hrothgar] sent men to them every three months or so, with heavy wagons and back-slings, to gather their tribute to his greatness. (37) This expansion of power makes Hrothgar into a great king. However, before the days of their greatness, Hrothgar had begun hardly stronger than the others, began to outstrip the rest. Hed shown them the strength of his organization. (37) His seemingly great abilities as king however, are not the only factors that contribute to Hrothgars great reputation.
In Chapter 4, the shaper arrives at Hrothgars mead hall. Unlike other poets, the shaper is able to sing of a false past so gloriously as to have it be true. By doing this, he encourages the Thanes to live-up to their false glory. Some may say that shaper is solely responsible for the advancement of the Thanes into the great kingdom. By Chapter 4, even Grendel is convinced that the lies the shaper sings of are true. This is evident when he says I knew them, had watched them; yet the things he said seemed true.
(47) The shaper embodies the summit of the Thanes greatness. His death later brings great sadness throughout the kingdom. The people listen silent and solemn to the old shapers song on the young mans lips. (147)Without the shaper to sing lies of his greatness, Hrothgar is no longer a great king. The Thanes have already conquered as much as they can, and the kingdom is now in a state of maintaining its power. Overall sadness at the death of the shaper, lack of motivation and threats upon the thrown drive the kingdom into a period of decline.
Hrothgar is no longer the proactive young king he used to be. Instead, puffy-eyed, he gets up, and in a kind of stupor goes to the meadhall to piss. (136) In all of this Grendels bad-faith is the target of Gardners polemic. Even if Grendel is the offspring of Cain, he continually reminds himself (not unlike the shaper) that he is free to change his behavior. But then again, he asks himself, why should he? On what grounds? So he knowingly denies his potential to choose moral behavior and continues to believe the fiction that hes a meaningless object.
His nihilistic revelations about the indifference of the universe and the relativity of values are nothing more than a feeble attempt to justify his role as a murderer. These ironic lines merely affirm the existence of the universe for-itself. When the forest echoes why not? (in other words, why not be good? ), he hears his own repressed self. All in all, Grendel the existentialist monster is a brilliant vehicle for Gardners dissection of the loopholes in Sartres definition of consciousness as nothingness. Resources Abrams, M. H. et al. , The Norton Anthology of English Literature.
Volume 1. 6th Edition. New York: W. W Norton & Company, 1993. Demmick, Donald. Alienation and the Process of Individuation. http://www. [email protected] uga. edu (16 February 1997). Gardner, John. Grendel. 1971; rpt. New York: Vintage Books, 1989. Genesis. The Bible. Kraft, William F. A Psychology of Nothingness. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: The Westminster Press, 1974. Magill, Frank. Critical Review of Long Fiction. Vol. III 4 vols. Pasadena, California: Salem Press, 1991, p 1273 Rebsamen, Frederick. Beowulf: A Verse Translation. New York: HarperCollins, 1991.