Therefore, the questions were asked pertaining to the themes: concept of SWB among the elderly; their thoughts, beliefs, attitudes and feelings concerning their experience of well-being or in other words the cognitive and affective components of SWB among the elderly; the different aspects of SWB of the elderly such as health, freedom, money, meaningful relationships, social interest, concept of time, attitude toward death, religion and/spirituality, and the societys attitude towards the elderly. Procedure Interviewing.
All the interview sessions were one-on-one or individual interviews, for which the researcher has jotted down notes. A session with the participants lasted about 45 to 90 minutes, sometimes with a break in between or without it. Once they got into their mode of story telling many of them did not like to be disturbed in the middle, and the researcher had to practise discretion while suggesting a break during the interview. The personal information sheet was completed before or after the interview session with them. Data Analysis
The researcher took down notes while interviewing. Listening to the interviews provided a richer understanding of the communication nuances than could be obtained from the notes alone. The researcher read through a few of the notes carefully and formed the initial categories under each research question, the concept of well-being, the indicators of cognitive and affective components, and the factors contribute to the sense of well-being among the institutionalized elderly from the perspective of their administrators.
As the process of content analysis progressed, new categories emerged and wereadded to the initial ones; some categories were modified, and still others were collated to fit into the emerging data. Integration of Results. The study adopted the interpretation of frequency and percentages in the results followed by Hill, Thompson, & Williams (1997), Knox, Hess, Petersen, & Hill (1997), and Ladany, Constantine, Miller, & Erickson (2000) in their studies. The Tables include the domains, categories, frequencies and percentage of the themes.
The frequency described as general applied to all cases, typical to at least half of the cases, and variant to fewer than half but at least two cases. Categories with one case were omitted. In the tables actual frequencies and percentages were presented and the interpretation as general, typical, and variant were given as foot note to the tables. It was thought to be more practical for the easy understanding of the variation in the responses elicited.