Colloids are created during the reaction. A colloid is halfway between a solution and a suspension. In a colloid, particles of matter measuring between about one-millionth of a millimetre and one-tenth of a millimetre in diameter are evenly scattered throughout liquid or gas. An example of a colloid is smoke, which are microscopic particles dispersed in the air.
Other colloids include dairy products like butter, the cytoplasm of cells, and fluids found inside our body tissues. These colloids absorb light, thereby obstructing a direct line of sight past them. In this way, the colloids created in the reaction, obstruct the view of the cross behind them. Results These are the results that I collected: Concentration (M) Na2S2O3 (ml) H2O (ml) Time  (s)   Average Rate 0.
I worked out the rate by doing the calculation And also worked out the concentration by As is possible to see from the chart, as the concentration increases, the time taken decreases exponentially. My prediction was correct. It is a curve because as the concentration increases, the particles of acid are in an increasingly higher ratio. The higher ratio means that collisions ==> reactions are more likely, and occur more frequently and so the time for the colloids to obscure the cross is less.
Eventually the time curve will flatten off, as the maximum reaction speed will be reached for that temperature. From the graph, it is possible to see that as concentration increases, so does rate. Both increases at equal amounts, creating a straight line of best fit with most of the points on or very close to the line. This means that concentration is directly proportional to rate. I think this happened because as the colloidal sulphur forms at a steady rate depending on strength of sodium thiosulphate, the steadily increasing concentration brought steadily increasing rate as well.
This was because a more concentrated liquid has a larger ratio of particles to water. This meant that the acid molecules were more likely to come into contact with the sodium, and therefore create a greater rate at which colloids were produced. We had anomalous results as we had to change our cross after the first five experiments, which changed the time scale. Also, the judging by eye technique was inaccurate and crude. We could not add the liquids together evenly (only by pouring), and the timer was started at small discrepancies with when the liquid was mixed.
Also, not all of the acid and mixed liquids came out of the beakers, making it more inaccurate. We could have improved it greatly by using a photosensitive diode to measure colloidal opacity and a computer-controlled timer would have enhanced our readings. Another way of combing the liquids evenly and without having to use physical means (for instance, a Y tube design with holders at the top would have kept time discrepancies to a minimum. Also, greasing/cleaning the equipment thoroughly would stop droplets of liquid clinging to the Pyrex containers.
We had results to confirm our conclusion, as the points were relatively straight and 80-90% on the line of best fit. A way to work out reaction time by mathematical means would have been a benefit, cutting out any practical experiment, and eliminating any chance of odd results. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Patterns of Behaviour section. Download this essay Print Save Not the one?